My Plan Facts

Wisconsin › Manufacturing › 100 to 249 participants

Form 5500 statement · plan year 1 Jan 2024 to 31 Dec 2024

Minneapolis-Fowlerville Corporation Retirement Plan

Sponsored by Minneapolis-Fowlerville Corporation, Clear Lake, WI

401(k) planautomatic enrollment

Form 5500 information is as filed by the plan administrator with the Department of Labor and may be amended. Figures reflect the plan year shown, not current balances. Form 5500 contains no individual account balances. Look up the original filing at EFAST2.

$9.9Mnet assets, end of plan year+5% on the year
186participants168 active
$53,103net assets per participantsame-size median $60,185
$2,918employer contributions per active participantsame-size median $2,447

Minneapolis-Fowlerville Corporation of Clear Lake, Wisconsin sponsors Minneapolis-Fowlerville Corporation Retirement Plan, a 401(k) plan. Its Form 5500 for the plan year ending 31 Dec 2024 shows 186 participants (168 active) and $9.9M in net assets.

Net assets came to $53,103 per participant, below the $60,185 median for defined contribution plans with 100 to 249 participants and below the $62,303 median for defined contribution plans in manufacturing. The figure is an average across everyone in the plan, including former employees with small balances; Form 5500 holds no individual account data.

The employer contributed $490K during the year, or $2,918 per active participant against a same-size median of $2,447; participants contributed $925K and $262K arrived as rollovers and other contributions. Benefits paid out totalled $2.2M.

Schedule C lists 4 service provider organisations paid $5,000 or more, with reported compensation of $59K: $317 per participant, well above the same-size median of $194. Administrative expenses charged to the plan were $58K. Schedule C does not capture every cost: fees netted from fund returns and fees the employer pays directly are outside it.

Across the filings on record, net assets went from $7.9M in 2022 to $9.9M in 2024 (up 25%), and participants from 156 to 186 (up 19%).

The independent accountant's opinion on the financial statements was unmodified (unqualified), from an audit whose scope was limited under ERISA section 103(a)(3)(C) to exclude investment information certified by a bank or insurer.

Compared with similar plans

MeasureThis planSame sizeSame industryAll US DC plans
Net assets per participant$53,103$60,185$62,303$53,102
Employer contributions per active participant$2,918$2,447$2,187$2,175
Schedule C compensation per participant$317$194$136$123
Schedule C compensation, share of net assets0.60%0.32%0.24%0.26%
Administrative expenses per participant$310$176$131$116

Peer columns are medians for plan year 2024 across defined contribution plans with 100 or more participants: 100 to 249 participants (21,996 plans), manufacturing (11,377) and all US plans (63,460). Fee medians cover plans that report an amount.

Trend by plan year

2022: $7.9M2023: $9.4M2024: $9.9M$7.9M$9.9M20222024
Net assets at year end
2022: 1562023: 1982024: 18615619818620222024
Participants at year end
Plan yearParticipantsNet assetsPer participantEmployer contributionsParticipant contributionsSchedule C compensation
2024186$9.9M$53,102$490K$925K$59K
2023198$9.4M$47,439$441K$834K$56K
2022156$7.9M$50,654$475K$659K$30K

Years in which the plan filed the full Form 5500 with 100 or more participants, from 2009. Plan year is the year in which the plan year began.

Statement for the year

  • Net assets, beginning of year$9,392,761
  • Employer contributions$490,237
  • Participant contributions$925,205
  • Rollovers and other contributions$261,907
  • Total contributions$1,677,349
  • Total income, including investment results$2,781,186
  • Benefits paid$2,239,104
  • Administrative expenses$57,716
  • Total expenses$2,296,820
  • Net income$484,366
  • Net transfers$0
  • Net assets, end of year$9,877,127

Participants

  • Active participants168
  • Retired or separated, receiving benefits0
  • Retired or separated, entitled to future benefits18
  • Participants with account balances185
  • Total participants, end of year186

Fees and service providers

$59KSchedule C compensation to organisations$59K direct · $0 indirect
$317per participantsame-size median $194
0.60%of net assetssame-size median 0.32%
$58Kadministrative expenses charged to the plan$310 per participant
OrganisationServices reportedDirectIndirect
Christensen Group Financial LLCInvestment advisory (plan)$26,971$0
TSC 401(k)Contract Administrator$19,458$0
Empower Annuity Insurance Company ORecordkeeping fees$11,995$0
Empower Advisory Group, LLCInvestment management$515$0

Schedule C, Part I line 2: providers that received $5,000 or more, with the form's own service codes. Individuals named on Schedule C (plan employees, individual trustees) are never shown and their compensation is excluded. Eligible indirect compensation disclosed by formula carries no dollar amount. See how to read Schedule C fees.

Administrative expenses on Schedule H

  • Recordkeeping fees$57,716
  • Total administrative expenses$57,716

Investment structure

Assets at year end by Schedule H category. The form shows the kind of vehicle holding the money, not the funds on the menu.

  • Registered investment companies (mutual funds)$8.2M · 83.0%
  • Common/collective trusts$749K · 7.6%
  • Insurance company general account$597K · 6.0%
  • Receivables$231K · 2.3%
  • Participant loans$106K · 1.1%

Audit and compliance answers, as filed

  • Accountant's opinionUnmodified (unqualified)
  • Audit scope limited under ERISA section 103(a)(3)(C)Yes
  • Accounting firmCarlson SV, LLP
  • Participant contributions reported as transmitted lateNo
  • Covered by a fidelity bondYes, $1,000,000
  • Blackout period during the yearNo

These are the plan administrator's own answers on Schedule H, Part IV. A reported late transmittal is the filer's disclosure of a timing lapse, usually corrected through the Department of Labor's voluntary program; the amount is the total involved, not a loss.

Plan characteristics

  • 2AAge/service weighted or new comparability or similar plan
  • 2EProfit-sharing plan
  • 2FERISA section 404(c) plan
  • 2GTotal participant-directed account plan
  • 2JCode section 401(k) feature
  • 2KCode section 401(m) arrangement
  • 2S401(k) plan or 403(b) plan that provides for automatic enrollment
  • 2TTotal or partial participant-directed account plan with a default investment account
  • 3DPre-approved pension plan
  • 3HPlan sponsor(s) is (are) a member(s) of a controlled group

Codes entered on Form 5500 line 8a, with the labels from the official instructions. Business code 332700: Machine Shops; Turned Product; & Screw, Nut, & Bolt Mfg.

Similar plans in Wisconsin

PlanSponsorParticipantsNet assetsPer participant
Felker Brothers Corporation Salaried 401(k) PlanFelker Brothers Corporation186$37.2M$200,002
American Custom Metal Fabricating, Inc. 401(k) PlanAmerican Custom Metal Fabricating, Inc.184$9.1M$49,511
The Little Potato Company USA, Inc. 401(k) PlanThe Little Potato Company, Inc.187$7.2M$38,420
Latitude Corp. Employee Stock Ownership PlanLatitude Corp.184−$4.4M—
Therm-Tech of Waukesha, Inc. 401(k) Savings PlanTherm-Tech of Waukesha, Inc.187$13.9M$74,393
KDV Label, LLC Retirement PlanKDV Label, LLC183$21.5M$117,260

Defined contribution plans in manufacturing closest in size.

Questions and answers

How big is Minneapolis-Fowlerville Corporation Retirement Plan?

186 participants at the end of the plan year ending 31 Dec 2024, of whom 168 were active employees, with net assets of $9,877,127. Among defined contribution plans that places it in the 100 to 249 participants band, which held 21,996 plans in plan year 2024.

What does Minneapolis-Fowlerville Corporation contribute per participant?

The filing reports $490,237 in employer contributions for the year, which is $2,918 per active participant; the median for plans of the same type and size was $2,447 in plan year 2024. Form 5500 reports the total only. It does not state the match formula, and the per-participant figure is an average, not any one person's contribution.

What fees does the plan pay and how do they compare?

Schedule C reports $58,939 in compensation to service provider organisations, $317 per participant or 0.60% of net assets. The same-size median among plans reporting any Schedule C compensation was $194 per participant. Administrative expenses on Schedule H were $57,716. Investment costs deducted inside mutual funds and other pooled vehicles are not itemised on Form 5500, so these figures are a floor rather than a full cost.

Who runs the plan?

The sponsor is Minneapolis-Fowlerville Corporation. Recordkeeping or administration: TSC 401(k) and Empower Annuity Insurance Company O. Investment advisory or management: Christensen Group Financial LLC and Empower Advisory Group, LLC. The financial statements were audited by Carlson SV, LLP. Form 5500 also names the plan administrator's signer and other individuals; this site publishes organisations only.

Was the audit opinion unqualified?

The filing reports an unmodified (unqualified) opinion from a limited-scope audit, in which the accountant did not audit investment information certified by a bank or insurance company. Unmodified (formerly "unqualified") is the standard clean opinion.

How current is this, and does it show my balance?

This is the Form 5500 for the plan year 1 Jan 2024 to 31 Dec 2024, received by the Department of Labor on 29 Sep 2025. Filings are due seven months after the plan year ends, or nine and a half with an extension, so the public record always runs a year or more behind. It contains plan-level totals only: no individual balances, contributions or names of participants exist in the data.

Provenance

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Form 5500 research files (Form 5500, Schedule H, Schedule C) for plan years 2009 to 2025, public domain, with filings received through 24 Aug 2026. This page shows the latest filing on record for EIN 41-1977442, plan 001, received 29 Sep 2025; an amended filing replaces it at the next build. Medians and percentiles are computed by this site; see the methodology. Report an error through corrections.