New Jersey › Manufacturing › 100 to 249 participants
Form 5500 statement · plan year 1 Jan 2024 to 31 Dec 2024
Technology Dynamics, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Sponsored by Technology Dynamics, Inc., Bergenfield, NJ
Form 5500 information is as filed by the plan administrator with the Department of Labor and may be amended. Figures reflect the plan year shown, not current balances. Form 5500 contains no individual account balances. Look up the original filing at EFAST2.
Technology Dynamics, Inc. of Bergenfield, New Jersey sponsors Technology Dynamics, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan, a 401(k) plan. Its Form 5500 for the plan year ending 31 Dec 2024 shows 168 participants (149 active) and $7.3M in net assets.
Net assets came to $43,294 per participant, well below the $60,185 median for defined contribution plans with 100 to 249 participants and well below the $62,303 median for defined contribution plans in manufacturing. The figure is an average across everyone in the plan, including former employees with small balances; Form 5500 holds no individual account data.
The employer contributed $13K during the year, or $84 per active participant against a same-size median of $2,447; participants contributed $632K. Benefits paid out totalled $1.2M.
Schedule C lists 4 service provider organisations paid $5,000 or more, with reported compensation of $91K: $539 per participant, well above the same-size median of $194. Administrative expenses charged to the plan were $111K. Schedule C does not capture every cost: fees netted from fund returns and fees the employer pays directly are outside it.
Across the filings on record, net assets went from $2.3M in 2010 to $7.3M in 2024 (up 220%), and participants from 131 to 168 (up 28%).
The independent accountant's opinion on the financial statements was unmodified (unqualified), from an audit whose scope was limited under ERISA section 103(a)(3)(C) to exclude investment information certified by a bank or insurer.
Compared with similar plans
| Measure | This plan | Same size | Same industry | All US DC plans |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net assets per participant | $43,294 | $60,185 | $62,303 | $53,102 |
| Employer contributions per active participant | $84 | $2,447 | $2,187 | $2,175 |
| Schedule C compensation per participant | $539 | $194 | $136 | $123 |
| Schedule C compensation, share of net assets | 1.2% | 0.32% | 0.24% | 0.26% |
| Administrative expenses per participant | $658 | $176 | $131 | $116 |
Peer columns are medians for plan year 2024 across defined contribution plans with 100 or more participants: 100 to 249 participants (21,996 plans), manufacturing (11,377) and all US plans (63,460). Fee medians cover plans that report an amount.
Trend by plan year
| Plan year | Participants | Net assets | Per participant | Employer contributions | Participant contributions | Schedule C compensation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 168 | $7.3M | $43,292 | $13K | $632K | $91K |
| 2023 | 184 | $6.8M | $36,918 | $11K | $540K | $45K |
| 2022 | 197 | $5.9M | $29,838 | $12K | $595K | $35K |
| 2021 | 194 | $7.6M | $39,335 | $9,000 | $529K | $47K |
| 2020 | 212 | $6.9M | $32,325 | $11K | $554K | $43K |
| 2019 | 189 | $6.4M | $33,751 | $50K | $537K | $45K |
| 2018 | 190 | $5.9M | $30,805 | $68K | $453K | $32K |
| 2017 | 174 | $5.8M | $33,098 | $62K | $411K | $46K |
| 2016 | 171 | $4.9M | $28,386 | $61K | $405K | $25K |
| 2015 | 170 | $4.4M | $25,729 | $50K | $334K | $25K |
| 2014 | 160 | $4.0M | $25,269 | $49K | $325K | $22K |
| 2013 | 164 | $3.6M | $21,811 | $43K | $289K | $18K |
| 2012 | 141 | $2.8M | $20,128 | $45K | $299K | $15K |
| 2011 | 143 | $2.3M | $15,874 | $44K | $296K | $14K |
| 2010 | 131 | $2.3M | $17,344 | $46K | $305K | $11K |
Years in which the plan filed the full Form 5500 with 100 or more participants, from 2009. Plan year is the year in which the plan year began.
Statement for the year
- Net assets, beginning of year$6,793,364
- Employer contributions$12,541
- Participant contributions$632,047
- Rollovers and other contributions$0
- Total contributions$724,091
- Total income, including investment results$1,809,494
- Benefits paid$1,193,244
- Administrative expenses$110,562
- Total expenses$1,329,383
- Net income$480,111
- Net transfers$0
- Net assets, end of year$7,273,475
Participants
- Active participants149
- Retired or separated, receiving benefits0
- Retired or separated, entitled to future benefits19
- Participants with account balances120
- Total participants, end of year168
Fees and service providers
| Organisation | Services reported | Direct | Indirect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raymond James Financial | Investment advisory (plan) | $57,953 | $0 |
| Neuhaus & Associates LLC | Accounting (including auditing) | $14,000 | $0 |
| Red Bank Pension Services, Inc. | Contract Administrator | $9,527 | $4,447 |
| Empower Annuity Ins. Co. of America | Recordkeeping fees | $4,708 | $0 |
Schedule C, Part I line 2: providers that received $5,000 or more, with the form's own service codes. Individuals named on Schedule C (plan employees, individual trustees) are never shown and their compensation is excluded. Eligible indirect compensation disclosed by formula carries no dollar amount. See how to read Schedule C fees.
Administrative expenses on Schedule H
- Contract administrator fees$110,562
- Total administrative expenses$110,562
Investment structure
Assets at year end by Schedule H category. The form shows the kind of vehicle holding the money, not the funds on the menu.
- Cash (interest and non-interest bearing)$7.1M · 97.0%
- Participant loans$193K · 2.7%
- Receivables$23K · 0.3%
Audit and compliance answers, as filed
- Accountant's opinionUnmodified (unqualified)
- Audit scope limited under ERISA section 103(a)(3)(C)Yes
- Accounting firmR. Neuhaus & Associates, LLC
- Participant contributions reported as transmitted lateNo
- Covered by a fidelity bondYes, $750,000
- Blackout period during the yearNo
These are the plan administrator's own answers on Schedule H, Part IV. A reported late transmittal is the filer's disclosure of a timing lapse, usually corrected through the Department of Labor's voluntary program; the amount is the total involved, not a loss.
Plan characteristics
2EProfit-sharing plan2FERISA section 404(c) plan2GTotal participant-directed account plan2JCode section 401(k) feature2KCode section 401(m) arrangement2TTotal or partial participant-directed account plan with a default investment account3DPre-approved pension plan
Codes entered on Form 5500 line 8a, with the labels from the official instructions. Business code 335900: Other Electrical Equipment & Component Mfg.
Similar plans in New Jersey
| Plan | Sponsor | Participants | Net assets | Per participant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lotito Foods Holding, LLC 401(k) Plan | Lotito Foods Holding, LLC | 169 | $1.4M | $8,173 |
| Puratos Corporation Union Employees 401(k) Savings Plan | Puratos Corporation | 168 | $2.4M | $14,330 |
| Generant Company, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust | Generant Company, Inc. | 171 | $14.1M | $82,433 |
| Hosokawa Micron Investment Retirement Plan | Hosokawa Micron International Inc. | 167 | $43.9M | $262,767 |
| Douglas Electrical Components, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan | Douglas Electrical Components, Inc. | 172 | — | — |
| Johanna Foods, Inc. Lacto Division (Local 152 Employees) SVGS and Inv Plan | Johanna Foods, Inc. | 166 | $5.1M | $30,455 |
Defined contribution plans in manufacturing closest in size.
Questions and answers
How big is Technology Dynamics, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan?
168 participants at the end of the plan year ending 31 Dec 2024, of whom 149 were active employees, with net assets of $7,273,475. Among defined contribution plans that places it in the 100 to 249 participants band, which held 21,996 plans in plan year 2024.
What does Technology Dynamics, Inc. contribute per participant?
The filing reports $12,541 in employer contributions for the year, which is $84 per active participant; the median for plans of the same type and size was $2,447 in plan year 2024. Form 5500 reports the total only. It does not state the match formula, and the per-participant figure is an average, not any one person's contribution.
What fees does the plan pay and how do they compare?
Schedule C reports $90,635 in compensation to service provider organisations, $539 per participant or 1.2% of net assets. The same-size median among plans reporting any Schedule C compensation was $194 per participant. Administrative expenses on Schedule H were $110,562. Investment costs deducted inside mutual funds and other pooled vehicles are not itemised on Form 5500, so these figures are a floor rather than a full cost.
Who runs the plan?
The sponsor is Technology Dynamics, Inc.. Recordkeeping or administration: Red Bank Pension Services, Inc. and Empower Annuity Ins. Co. of America. Investment advisory or management: Raymond James Financial. The financial statements were audited by R. Neuhaus & Associates, LLC. Form 5500 also names the plan administrator's signer and other individuals; this site publishes organisations only.
Was the audit opinion unqualified?
The filing reports an unmodified (unqualified) opinion from a limited-scope audit, in which the accountant did not audit investment information certified by a bank or insurance company. Unmodified (formerly "unqualified") is the standard clean opinion.
How current is this, and does it show my balance?
This is the Form 5500 for the plan year 1 Jan 2024 to 31 Dec 2024, received by the Department of Labor on 22 Sep 2025. Filings are due seven months after the plan year ends, or nine and a half with an extension, so the public record always runs a year or more behind. It contains plan-level totals only: no individual balances, contributions or names of participants exist in the data.
Provenance
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, Form 5500 research files (Form 5500, Schedule H, Schedule C) for plan years 2009 to 2025, public domain, with filings received through 24 Aug 2026. This page shows the latest filing on record for EIN 22-2119658, plan 002, received 22 Sep 2025; an amended filing replaces it at the next build. Medians and percentiles are computed by this site; see the methodology. Report an error through corrections.